2014 (4) TMI 729

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aikh and Mr. I.A. Patel For the Respondent : Mr. Jaimin Ganghi ORDER Akil Kureshi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties for final disposal of the petition. Petitioner has challenged order dated 24.1.2013 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Bhavnagar by which registration of the petitioner under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act,2003 ('the Act' for sho....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iminal case to come to the conclusion that in the interest of the Revenue, it is not desirable to grant him registration. The petitioner has preferred an appeal before the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal against the said order and the Tribunal has also dismissed the appeal of the petitioner by order dated 13.3.2013. Hence this petition. Admittedly, such decision was taken without hearing the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re doubtful is raised for the first time in the petition. On the other hand, learned AGP Shri Gandhi for the respondents supported the order contending that in terms of rule 5(15) of the said Rules, it was open for the competent authority, if it was not satisfied with the details furnished by the dealer, to cancel the provisional registration number. Prima facie, it does appear to be a case ....