2014 (4) TMI 722

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent : Shri K S V V Prasad, SDR JUDGEMENT Per: Mathew John: The first appellant is a company which imported certain goods under two bills of entry filed in Chennai Customs House. The second Appellant Shri J. Chandrasekhar Reddy is the Joint Managing Partner of the first appellant company. The third appellant Shri Jatin N. Gandhi is a Partner of the indenting firm who is adjudged to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hese goods were in fact "Plastic Processing or Injection Molding Machines" classifiable under Heading 84771000 of Customs Tariff Act on which anti-dumping duty was imposed with effect from 12.05.2009 by Notification No.47/2009-Cus., dated 12.05.2009. The Revenue also noticed that the value declared was suppressed from actual value. Based on such evidences, a Show Cause Notice alleging mis-declarat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellants submits that during adjudication proceedings principles of natural justice were denied inasmuch as, the following documents were not supplied;     (i) complete set of documents recovered by the GEQD from their computer, seized by Revenue,     (ii) copies of the documents recovered from the premises of Jatin N. Gandhi,     (iii) books of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e appeal without any pre-deposit. 8. The Counsel for the third applicant also submits that without concluding the adjudication against the first two appellants properly, adjudication against the third appellants cannot be sustained. 9. Opposing the prayer, the learned Authorized Representative for the Revenue relies on the various evidences unearthed during the search operation which show ne....