Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (5) TMI 551

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. ORDER Being aggrieved with the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. Heard Ms. Renu Jagdev, learned AR, appearing for the Revenue and Shri K.K. Sharma, learned Advocate, appearing for the respondent. 3. As per facts on record, the respondents are engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods falling under Chapters 54 and 5....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat there has been excess processing loss is not justified. He observed that shrinkage would vary from fabric to fabric and in the absence of any allegation by the Revenue that such quantity attributed to shortage was removed clandestinely, confirmation of demand was not warranted. 5. Revenue in their memo of appeal have again reiterated the same very ground. It stands contended that as per Boa....