Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (5) TMI 544

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent. ORDER The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of re-rolling product falling under Chapter 72 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. During the year 1997 a new Section 3A was introduced by the Govt. and Rules were framed thereunder i.e. the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Production Capacity Determination Rules, 1997. Under these rules....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....king under the APC did not discharge their duty liability as fixed by the Commissioner from time to time and on the fixed dates as prescribed under the Rules and the Notification issued there under during the period September 1997 to March 2000. The appellants were issued five show cause notices demanding Central Excise duty to the tune of Rs. 7,40,690/- and also invoked provisions of Rule 96ZP(3)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a Processors and Other, vide decision dated 16-3-2012 [since reported in 2012 (280) E.L.T. 186 (Guj.)] have held that, after the omission of Rules 96ZQ, 96ZP and 96ZO of Central Excise Rules, 1944 with effect from 1-3-2001, no proceeding could have been initiated there under and after omission of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with effect from 11-5-2001 without any saving clause, no pe....