TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2012 (1) TMI 132
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Shekhon, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri R.K. Verma, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER The prayer in the applications is to dispense with condition of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 3,81,64,415/- confirmed against the applicants and identical amount of penalty imposed upon them and penalties on other applicants. 2. After hearing both sides, we find that the appellants are engaged in th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....premises for which the said dealers could not produce any documentary evidence to show the legal procurement of same. However, it is seen from the Mahazar dated 21-8-2007 made at the time of search of the said dealer at Kerala that the documents recovered from his premises indicated the manufacturer as Shree Raj Pan Masala Pvt. Ltd., Village Banar, Jodhpur-Jaipur Highway, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Some ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ers of Bombay 1000 gutkha with the Railways where the name of the manufacturer was not available, was also taken into consideration. 6. Though, learned Advocate appearing before us has advanced detailed arguments but for the purpose of stay, we take into consideration the facts that at the point of investigation i.e. the goods recovered from the Kerala dealer indicated the manufacturer of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ve statement is to the clearances effected at Jodhpur factory, which learned Advocate submit is not the subject matter of present proceeding. Duty related to the same already stands remitted by Jodhpur factory. Further to link the un-named booking in the Railways to the applicant's clearances from their factory, without their being any evidence to that effect is, prima facie, uncalled for. Applica....