2011 (10) TMI 535

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri R. Nagar, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER Short point to be decided in this case is whether the appellants are required to reverse Cenvat credit of Rs. 5,53,466/- involved on the inputs and raw materials contained in the finished products destroyed due to fire. In this case a fire accident took place in the appellant's factory on 23-5-2008. Department was informed within 24 hours on 24-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ommissioner. In the meanwhile on the appeal filed by the appellants, the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) passed the impugned order rejecting their appeal on 14-10-2009 against which they are in appeal. 2. The ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellants submitted that in this case the demand for Cenvat credit availed on the raw materials contained in the finished goods, has been confirmed and this i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....edly the remission application has been rejected. It is not known whether any appeal has been filed against the same. Nevertheless a reading of sub-rule (5C) of Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 would show that when the demand of duty is ordered to be remitted under Rule 21 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, Cenvat credit is required to be reversed. In the absence of a remission order as submitted b....