2011 (9) TMI 878

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Negi, SDR, for the Department. Shri J.C. Patel, Advocate, for the Assessee. ORDER The brief facts of the case are that respondent manufactured tools and dies for a customer and used the same in their own factory for manufacture of components for the same customer. The respondent recovered the price of such tools and dies from the customer by raising a commercial invoice. However, no duty ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sue has been finally settled and since the Tribunal is bound by that order he is not contesting the same. As regards tools and dies, he submits that once these tools, dies and fixtures have been sold to the customers, it has to be held that there was a deemed removal of tools, dies and fixtures to the customer and the same were received back for use in the manufacture of components for the custome....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s have been removed from the factory. 3. I have considered the submissions made by both the sides. As regards GTA service, in view of the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of ABB Ltd., the issue is no longer res integra. In this case the period involved is prior to 1-4-2008 when the definition of input service was amended. Therefore the decision of the Hon'ble Hig....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ngalore reported in 1994 (71) E.L.T. 801 (Tribunal), Elcon Clipsal India Ltd. v. CCE, Ahmedabad reported in 2002 (146) E.L.T. 360 (Tri. - Delhi) are applicable to the facts of this case. In both the cases, the Tribunal took the view that notification nowhere provides that the use of capital goods should be on account of the manufacturer. It was also observed by the Tribunal in the case of BPL Elec....