Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (1) TMI 538

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., "the Act") are directed against the order of the Tribunal dated April 10, 2000 relating to the assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86. It appears that for both the assessment years, assessment orders were passed ex parte. The dealer/opposite party (hereinafter referred to as, "the dealer") filed applications under section 30 of the Act to reopen the ex parte assessment orders. The applications ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g barred by limitation. The Commissioner of Trade Tax filed appeals before the Tribunal. The Tribunal by the impugned order dismissed both the appeals and confirmed the order of the first appellate authority. Heard learned counsel for the parties. I do not find any error in the order of the Tribunal. Issue involved is squarely covered by the Full Bench decision of this court in the case of M....