TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2014 (4) TMI 453
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Per: Jawad Rahim: The petitioner, a partnership concern in business of providing/letting out the premises converted into marriage hall at Palace Ground, Bangalore, is registered under the Karnataka Tax on Luxuries Act, 1979. 2. In this writ action, the petitioner seeks writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 13.1.2014 vide Annexure 'C' and consequentially Demand Notice....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssued notice alleging suppression of tax, by the petitioner. In response to the said notice, the petitioner claims it has filed a detailed reply on 1.1.2013 and on 17th and 18th day of January 2013, contending inter alia that the petitioner has not suppressed any tax to the Government. It gives a detailed explanation and produced the books of accounts and other relevant documents regarding renting....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he respondent authority has reproduced the discrepancies in the said report and asked the petitioner to file objection in 7 days. The proposition notice is dated 13.11.2013 produced at Annexure 'A'. 9. It is further contended that on receipt of proposition notice, the petitioner has filed a detailed reply answering to the various grounds urged against it and has clarified and explained th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ent. 11. No doubt, the contention of the respondent certainly support the case. The respondent - authority has considered the answers given by the petitioner to the Inspection Report, but it is necessary to note, the petitioner had sought an opportunity of personal hearing to support various contentions which are urged to absolve itself of the alleged charge of suppression. The petitioner also ma....