2014 (4) TMI 130

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ohan Bansal, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Sukhdev Sharma, Advocate ORDER Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short "the Act") against the order dated 21.10.2013 (Annexure A-7) passed by the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of agriculture produce. The assessee entered into an agreement with the labour contractor from time to time for labour and cartage work. As per the agreement, the contractor would be responsible for arranging labour and carts for handling and transportation of foodgrains and would make arrangement for loading and unloading of railway wagons. During the audit of the assessee, it was found that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... directed the appellant to deposit 50% of the adjudicated liability of service tax along with the proportionate interest on the said amount. Hence, the present appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in terms of order dated 12.12.2013 passed by this Court, a sum of Rs. 1 crore was deposited. He argued that the Tribunal be directed to hear the appeal without further deposit. ....