2014 (4) TMI 14

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant : A. P. Mathur For the Respondent : S.S.C.(Central Excise),S. P. Kesarwani ORDER Heard Shri A.P. Mathur, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri B.K.S. Raghuvanshi for the Department. This appeal has been filed under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 which has been admitted on the following two questions: "(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../2010 before the Tribunal. The appeal was called out in the earlier part of the day and on a request made by the learned Advocate that he was busy before the Hon'ble Single Bench, the matter was kept back. Subsequently it was again called out at 3.25 P.M. No one appeared, hence the appeal was dismissed in default. On the same day the learned counsel for the appellant filed an application for r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd it was due to the fact that the learned counsel for the appellant had to rush to the High Court, therefore, no one could appear at 3.25 P.M. when the appeal was called out. Earlier when the case was listed for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant was present, however the case could not be decided. He submits that there was a bonafide reason for not appearing when the case was called out f....