2014 (3) TMI 836

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate ORDER Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. C.M. No. 3475-CII of 2013 This is an application for condonation of 26 days' delay in the filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is supported by an affidavit, the delay of 26 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of accordingly. CEA No. 8 of 2013 1. This appeal has been pref....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as financial grounds? (e) Whether grave and palpable injustice would be caused to the Appellant if the Respondents are permitted to execute the legal order? 2. Put shortly, the facts necessary for adjudication of the present appeal as narrated therein are that the assessee is engaged in the manufacture of various articles of wood like doors, chowkhats etc. and was also selling wood. The assesse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....directed the appellant to pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 2.75 crores as amount of duty out of total demand of Rs. 3.30 crores. Still dissatisfied, the appellant filed CWP No. 15851 of 2012 in this Court. This Court vide order dated 21.9.2012 (Annexure A-6) directed the Tribunal not to dismiss the appeal for want of deposit. The aforesaid writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 28th January, 2013, wi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t and submitted that the amount as directed by the Tribunal was reasonable and justified. 5. The primary dispute that arises for consideration in this appeal relates to the quantum of pre-deposit to be made by the appellant as a condition precedent for the hearing of the appeal. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the totality of the facts and circumstances of the ca....