2014 (3) TMI 836

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rg, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate ORDER Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. C.M. No. 3475-CII of 2013 This is an application for condonation of 26 days' delay in the filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is supported by an affidavit, the delay of 26 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of accordingly. CE....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellant has strong prima facie case on merits as well as financial grounds? (e) Whether grave and palpable injustice would be caused to the Appellant if the Respondents are permitted to execute the legal order? 2. Put shortly, the facts necessary for adjudication of the present appeal as narrated therein are that the assessee is engaged in the manufacture of various articles of wood like d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3). The Tribunal vide order dated 26.6.2012 (Annexure A-1) directed the appellant to pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 2.75 crores as amount of duty out of total demand of Rs. 3.30 crores. Still dissatisfied, the appellant filed CWP No. 15851 of 2012 in this Court. This Court vide order dated 21.9.2012 (Annexure A-6) directed the Tribunal not to dismiss the appeal for want of deposit. The aforesaid writ pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant and submitted that the amount as directed by the Tribunal was reasonable and justified. 5. The primary dispute that arises for consideration in this appeal relates to the quantum of pre-deposit to be made by the appellant as a condition precedent for the hearing of the appeal. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keep....