TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2011 (9) TMI 855
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eard Sri Bharat Ji Agrawal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Piyush Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri S.P. Kesarwani, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 74514 of 2008. Cause shown for the delay in filing the Review Application is sufficient. The delay in filing the Review Application No.74515 of 2008 stands ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 2007-08. The Writ Petition was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 18.12.2007 following the decision of Division Bench of this Court dated 28.09.2007 passed in Writ Petition No.278 of 2004 (Tax) between M/s Ambika Steels Pvt. Ltd. versus State of U.P. and others. Against the aforesaid judgment dated 18.12.2007 the petitioners preferred petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.4645 o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... way of an I.A. in the matter pending before the larger Bench. Allowed to be withdrawn." It is pursuant to the said order that the present Review Application has been filed. Sri Bharat Ji Agrawal, learned Senior Advocate has submitted that vide order dated 18.02.2008 passed in a bunch of similar petitions the Division Bench had referred the following questions of law to be answered by a larger ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....roduction of the previous years. The base production includes the quantity of the stock transfer/consignment transaction. In view of above, we are of the considered opinion that the view taken by the Division Bench in the case of Ambika Steel Private Limited Vs. State of U.P. and others (Supra) and in the case of M/s IFFCO Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & others does not lay down the correct law and as s....