2014 (3) TMI 669
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r Singh , Jt.CDR ORDER Per Archana Wadhwa (for the Bench): The prayer is to dispense with the condition of pre-deposit of Rs.6,70,15,133/- ,which stand confirmed against the applicant by denying them the benefit of Cenvat credit availed in respect of various iron and steel items used for expansion of their thermal power plant. The said credit was availed by the applicant during the period....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t Ltd. vs. CCE CEA(L) No. 46 of 2012 Bombay High Court 3. M/s. Salasar Steel and Power Ltd. vs. CCE Stay Order No. 193/2012-Ex dated 9.2.2012 4. Balakrishna Industries vs. CCE Stay Order No. 909/2012-Ex dated 13.6.2012 5. M/s. C.G. Ispat Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE Stay Order No. 1274/2011 Ex dated 23.11.2011 6. M/s. Sourabh Rolling Mills (P) Ltd. vs. CCE Stay Order No. 1456/2011 Ex dated 15.12.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the decisions contrary to the decision in Vandana Global by any stretch of imagination malafide intention to conceal or suppress the facts cannot be attributed to the appellant. As such, taking into account that only part of the demand would be within limitation, we direct the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs.7,01,971/- (Rupees seven lakh one thousand nine hundred seventy one only) within a period....
TaxTMI