2014 (3) TMI 595

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rized Representative (DR) ORDER Per. Archana Wadhwa :- The prayer is to dispense with the condition of pre-deposit of duty demand of Rs. 10,79,267/- and an identical amount of penalty which stands confirmed against the applicant by denying them the benefit of Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 1/3/2003 on the ground that they have used the brand name of other manufacturers. 2. After hear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2000 (115) E.L.T. 45 (Bom.). The distinction from the said decision was made by the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Chandigarh vs. GCM Labs vide final order No. A/1297/2012-EX (BR) dated 23/10/2012 as brought to our notice by the learned DR. However, we find that the said decision was held not applicable in a situation where the drugs were admittedly being manufactured for another pharmaceutical com....