TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2014 (3) TMI 223
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....above impugned notice dated 22 March 2013, the respondent No.1 - Assessing Officer is seeking to reopen the assessment for the Assessment Year 200607. 3 On 28 November 2006, the petitioner filed its return of income for Assessment Year 200607, declaring a total income of Rs.60.21 lakhs. On 21 April 2008, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act, determining the petitioner's income at Rs.62.21 lakhs. 4 Thereafter, the impugned notice was issued on 22 March 2013 under Section 148 of the Act seeking to reopen the assessment for the Assessment Year 200607. In response to the petitioner's request, the Assessing Officer on 10 September 2013 served a copy of the reasons recorded by him for the is....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gned notice dated 22 March 2013. In particular, in its objections, the petitioner pointed out that all the facts which form the basis of the reasons for reopening as recorded were all disclosed by the petitioner during the original assessment proceedings leading to the Assessment Order dated 21 April 2008. Thus, the impugned notice dated 22 March 2013 itself is without jurisdiction as there was no failure to disclose all facts necessary for assessment. It was also pointed out that there is a mistake in the reasons as the computation of income as filed along with the return discloses the net profit at Rs.1.27 Crores and not at Rs.60.80 lakhs as alleged. Besides, the details filed under Section 44AB of the Act were reflected in the computatio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and Loss Account was taken by the petitioner at Rs.60.87 Crores instead of the actual profit is Rs.1.27 Crores. The computation of income filed along with return of income indicates that the net profit has indeed been taken at Rs.1.27 Crores and not Rs.60.87 Lakhs as alleged in the reasons in support of the impugned notice. (c) All details as indicated in the reasons were furnished during the assessment proceedings under Section 44AB of the Act along with return of income. The computation of income filed along with return filed by the petitioner indicate that the amounts of expenditure which are sought to be added as disallowed were either furnished in the computation of income itself or subject of information sought for during the cour....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ent Year i.e. 200607. The first proviso to Section 147 of the Act which would apply provides that where an assessment is done under Section 143(3) of the Act then no action for reassessment will be taken after the end of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year unless there has been failure on the part of the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. From the reasons recorded for issuing the impugned notice dated 22 March 2013, it is evident that all material on the basis of which the Assessing Officer formed the reasonable belief that income has escaped assessment were on record during the assessment proceedings, leading to the Assessing Order dated 21 April 2008. It is, therefore, cle....