2014 (2) TMI 1086
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....v. For the Respondent : Mr D D Joshi, Superintendent (AR) PER : P R Chandrasekharan The appeal and stay petition are directed against Order-in-Appeal No. RPS/52/NSK / 2013 dated 25/02/2013 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, (Appeals), Nasik. 2. Vide the impugned order a service tax demand of Rs.9,23,092/- has been confirmed against the appellant M/s. Jay Enterprise....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....its that the appellant has made a payment of Rs.2,67,392/- and interest of Rs.46,154/- against the confirmed demands. Accordingly, he pleads for grant of stay. 4. The learned Superintendent (AR) appearing for the Revenue, on the other hand submits that, for the period 2006-07 onwards, the appellant themselves have been classifying the service under Business Auxiliary Service and discharged serv....
TaxTMI