2014 (2) TMI 568

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri J.S. Negi, Authorised Representative, for the Respondent. ORDER The facts of the case are that the appellants had removed some of their inputs to their sister concern situated at Silvassa under three invoices by paying duty on the 'transaction value' instead of reversing the Cenvat credit as per Rule 3(4)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The differential duty involved was Rs. 1,24....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....th of June, 2007 whereas show-cause notice was issued on 5-2-2009. He submits that this was only a mistake and there was no intention to evade duty. Therefore, as soon as the omission was pointed out, the duty amount payable of Rs. 1,24,444/- with interest was debited on the very same day. He also submits that since clearances were made to the sister concern, there was no need for them to resort t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of limitation is not applicable. 4. I have considered the submissions made by both sides. The extended period has been invoked and has been upheld on the ground that when the goods have been cleared to the sister unit, the duty was paid only on notional value since supply has been made to the sister unit. The Commissioner (Appeals) has also observed that the advocate for the appellant cou....