Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (2) TMI 286

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DR PER : D N Panda Both sides are in dispute on the facts whether there was finalization of provisional assessment and if so what is the consequences thereof. Appellants says that refund claim arose upon finalization of provisional assessment and no unjust enrichment test is applicable to such refund following the decision of the Tribunal in the case of ABB Ltd. vs CC, New Delhi reported [20....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unjust enrichment. If the provisional assessment relating to 209 bills finalized by an express order, there shall be no dispute at all since that can be verified from the order assessing finally. But no such order was placed before us to show in clear terms as to finalization of provisional assessment relating to 209 Bills of Entry. 4. The appellant failed to show from order dated 10.3.04 that ....