2014 (1) TMI 1108

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ER Per: S.S. Kang The applicant filed these applications for condonation of delay in filing appeal Nos. E/1431/12, 85327, 85328 and 85329/13. There is a delay of 177 days in filing the appeals. The contention of the applicant is that applicant challenged the adjudication order before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court by filing Writ Petition and the Hon'ble Bombay High Court vide order dated 7.9.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....condonation of delay. In these circumstances, it is a fit case for condonation of delay. 2. The revenue submitted that there is a considerable delay and the applicant had wrongly challenged the adjudication order before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court as the order is appealable. 3. We find that the applicant challenged the adjudication order before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and the Hon'ble....