Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (1) TMI 773

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dditional Commissioner (AR) ORDER This application filed by the appellant seeks waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the adjudged dues including an amount of Rs. 5,94,015/- demanded on the ground of availment of inadmissible CENVAT credit. On a perusal of the records, I find that the appellant, during the material period, was manufacturing and supplying certain goods, und....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e appellant claims a nexus between the two inasmuch as inland transportation and transit insurance were also part of the second contract viz. Erection Contract. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the output service could not have been rendered to PGCIL without transportation of goods from the factory to the customers sites and without transit insurance. It is submitted that b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in Appeal No. ST/1354/2010 of the same assessee. In that Stay Order, prima facie case was found in favour of the same assessee against the CENVAT credit denied on GTA service used by them for bringing goods from their factory to the premises of PGCIL. It was also noted that the assessee had already paid Rs. 25 lakhs towards demand of duty of Rs. 69,36,450/-, interest thereon and penalty. The asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....freight and insurance, from PGCIL and therefore they were not entitled to claim CENVAT credit of such tax. After considering the rival submissions, I have found some substance in the point made by the learned Additional Commissioner (AR). It appears, even in the earlier case of the same assessee, they paid a fair part of the amount of CENVAT credit taken on GTA service. In the instant case also, t....