Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1995 (9) TMI 369

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... against the suo motu revisional order of the Joint Commissioner under section 34 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 holding that the assessee's turnover to the extent of Rs. 3,96,630.83 relating to "nylon zip" would have to be taxed only under entry 145 of the First Schedule read with section 3(2) of the Act and not under multi-point levy pursuant section 3(1) of the Act. The said entr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1 (Ker) where it has been observed that though nylon and plastic articles are having the same source materials, the articles of nylon are understood in the popular sense differently from the articles of plastic. The relevant observation at page 356 is as follows: "Though a scientific analysis of plastics and nylon reveals that both have a petro-chemical base, in commercial field nylon belongs to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....even if the source material is the same, this Court referred to [1991] 81 STC 351 (Ker) [Importex International (P) Ltd. v. State of Kerala] thus: "In Importex International (P) Ltd. v. Union of India [1991] 81 STC 351, the Kerala High Court had to deal with an identical question. In that case the petitioners were dealers in nylon fishnets. In that case, subsidiary question arose relating to the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....from plastic article, adopting the common parlance theory could not be disputed by the learned counsel for the Revenue also. In fact she fairly pointed out our own earlier judgment dated July 10, 1995* in T.C. No. 69 of 1989 dealing with the question relating to glass bottles and glass wares. There also we reiterated the same principles as laid down in [1991] 81 STC 351 (Mad.). [Importex Internati....