2013 (12) TMI 1298

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es, for the Appellant. Shri P.N. Das, Commissioner (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER Revenue has filed this miscellaneous application to amend the cause title of their appeal by incorporating the names of 37 importers/transfers as respondents, whose names are mentioned herein as under :- 1.     Punit Impex 2.     Tex Fab Corporation 3. &....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Pvt. Ltd. 20.   The Hind Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. 21.   Fems India 22.   Satidham Industries Ltd. 23.   S. Kumar Synfabs Ltd. 24.   Vivilon Textiles India Pvt. Ltd. 25.   Asia Polytex (I) Ltd. 26.   Agarwal Brothers 27.   Pelican Syntex Ltd. 28.   Aupam Traders Filaments Ltd. 29.&n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mely, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. CCE, Calcutta reported in 1983 (14) E.L.T. 1956, CCE, Jalandhar v. Prince Agro & Allied Industries reported in 2008 (232) E.L.T. 649 (Tri.-Del.) = 2010 (18) S.T.R. 379 (Tribunal), CCE, Daman v. Shree Sainath Fabrics Industries Ltd. reported in 2003 (158) E.L.T. 218 (Tri.-Del.) and CCE, Bangalore v. N.A. Jayaram reported in 2003 (161) E.L.T. 412. 3. On behalf....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ents. Moreover, they have filed the main appeal against the main appellant, i.e., M/s. Chokhani Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd., in April, 2008 and they have made this application in November, 2010. The case laws relied upon by the ld. DR are not relevant to the facts of the case as in those cases, a composite appeal was filed against all the respondents, but in this case no appeal has been filed against the....