2013 (12) TMI 1296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Advocate For the Respondent: Sri S. Chakraborty, A.C. (A.R.) ORDER Per DR. D. M. MISRA: This is an application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs.10.01 Lakhs and equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 11AC of CEA, 1944. 2. At the outset, the Ld. Advocate Dr. Samir Chakraborty submitted that the applicants are engaged in the manufacture of unbranded shoes and mention the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....their Brand name cleared/sold the branded shoes on payment of appropriate duty, a fact, not in dispute, hence, the said duty cannot be recovered from the applicant again. 3. The Ld. A.R. for the Revenue did not dispute the payment of duty byM/s Khadim Shoe Pvt. Ltd on the goods manufactured by the Applicant. However, he has submitted that the duty ought to have been paid by the applicant being ....