Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (12) TMI 1194

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....B.L. Soni, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER The prayer in the application is to dispense with the condition of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 1,00,476/- and penalty of identical amount. 2. After hearing both the sides, we find that the appellants declared the imported oil as sulphonated fish oil classifiable under heading 3402.9020. Samples were drawn and sent to CRCL which revealed that the goo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... were sulphonated fish oil (other than fish oil) but free from mineral oil. The Assistant Commissioner held that as the retest report establishes that the goods were not mineral oil, he accepted the appellants contention that the same are sulphonated fish oil. He accordingly dropped the demand against the appellant. 5. Being aggrieved by the said order, the Revenue filed an appeal before the Co....