Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (4) TMI 906

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vide exhibits P2 to P7 for recovery of arrears of sales tax due from one Mrs. Jessy Chacko who is the defaulter to sales tax. The petitioners' contention is that recovery against the petitioners is on account of execution of exhibit P1 surety bond in form No. 6 undertaking to discharge liability to the extent of Rs. 1,10,000 in the event of the assessee (Jessy Chacko) failing to remit the same. I ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he defaulter's property for any liability over and above the amount secured by exhibit P1 bond. It is seen that the petitioners have not made the defaulter a party in this case, though the petitioners jointly executed exhibit P1 surety bond in form No. 6 before the first respondent. Therefore, I find the petitioners are not entitled to any more relief than limiting the extent of liability to the a....