Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (9) TMI 951

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....alasundaram The Revenue is aggrieved by extension of credit of Rs.1,16,634/- to the assessees herein, who are manufacturers of Polyester and Viscose Yarn etc. Credit was sought to be denied on the ground that the documents such as Debit Notes, Freight Certificates etc., were not prescribed documents for the purpose of taking credit. Credit was disallowed and penalty was imposed by the adjudicat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uired under Rule 9(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, are shown in the documents such as debit notes on the strength of which the assessees took credit, there was no ground for denial of substantive right to credit. The same view has been taken by the Tribunal in the assessee's own case as seen from Final Order No.463/10 dt. 21.04.10 and Final Order No.694/10 dt. 24.06.10. In those cases, the is....