Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (12) TMI 1053

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 3. Brief facts of the issue are that the assessee is engaged in the business of disposal of liquidated industrial undertakings. The Assessing Officer while completing assessment under section 143(3) of the Act noticed that the assessee has received unsecured loans from the following parties : S. No. Name Amount (Rs.) Remarks 1. Padmavathi 12,00,000 Loan 2. K. Venubabu 8,00,000 Advance 3. J. S. Chowdary 4,00,000 Advance 4. P. Sailaja 1,61,335 Advance 5. P. Sailal 6.38,665 Advance 6. P. Sridevi 8,00,000 Advance 7.   Venkateswar Rao 16,00,000   Advance   8. New Smile 8,00,000 Adv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nts of four parties which did not reveal any suspicious features, therefore, section 68 of the Act is not applicable. Further, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) observed that as the assessee furnished details of all the eight parties along with cheque/ demand drafts details and also bank account in respect of four parties and also explained circumstances under which the cash credits were received, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) deleted the addition. Against the deletion of addition, the Revenue is in appeal before us. 6. The learned Departmental representative submitted that the assessee has not discharged the burden cast upon it with regard to identity and capacity of the parties and genuineness of the transactions. He ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ordingly, the above 8 persons, as tabulated in the earlier paras, contributed Rs.64 lakhs. He submitted that the assessee has filed addresses of all the parties before the lower authorities and also bank accounts of four of them and established authenticity of the transactions. According to the authorised representative the assessee discharged the initial burden cast upon it and to prove it otherwise, the Assessing Officer shall bring the facts to show that the entries are bogus or accommodation entries. Further, he relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Bharat Engineering and Construction Co. [1972] 83 ITR 187 (SC) for the proposition that the assessee cannot derive huge profit within a few days of commencement o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing Officer may bring to charge that sum as income of the previous year if (i) the sum is found credited in the books of the assessee for any previous year, (ii) the assessee offers no explanation about the nature of source of that sum, and (iii) the explanation is not, in the opinion of the Assessing Officer, satisfactory ; where the sum credited may be in the assessee's name or in the name of a third party, the assessee is liable to place necessary evidence in support of the claim to facilitate the Assessing Officer to cause the necessary enquiry. The Assessing Officer has every power to enquire into all the relevant facts brought on record by the assessee. 10. In the present case the assessee has taken a plea that the assessee has fur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessee maintained books of account. Further some transaction, which have, taken place by cheque cannot be said that the transaction is genuine. It is the burden on the assessee to establish the identity of the creditors, capacity of the creditors to advance money and genuineness of the transaction. Once the assessee discharged the burden then the burden will shift to the Department. It is not correct to state that the Assessing Officer is not entitled to reject the explanation of the assessee, if in his opinion the evidence produced by the assessee is not enough to believe that the transaction is genuine. It is incumbent upon the assessee to prove that the credit entry in its books of account does not represent any income and that the par....