2013 (12) TMI 764
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....is is an appeal by the department against an order of the Commissioner (Appeals) No. 147/2009, dated 2-12-2009. 2. None appears for the respondent in spite of notice. 3.1 The Original authority, while considering the claim of the respondent for refund under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004, allowed refund of Rs. 13,53,722/- and rejected the balance of Rs. 5,45,174/-. 3.2 Against the ord....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hat they have all the relevant documents. The relevant portion of the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is reproduced :- "9. Further, the other reasons for denying refund are - Document does not contain service provider details; in admissible document; documents not produced. The appellant has stated that they have submitted all the documents in support of the claim and that all details ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....espect of the other grounds on which the refund has been rejected, the Commissioner (Appeals) has merely given another opportunity to the respondents to produce the documents before the Original authority for fresh consideration. This has been given in the light of the submissions made before the Commissioner (Appeals). As the matter required factual verification by the Original authority, the cou....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI