2013 (12) TMI 449

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Prasad Paranjape, Adv. PER : Ashok Jindal The revenue is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) following the earlier Order-in-Appeal in the case of the respondent on identical issue allowed the appeal of the respondents. The respondents have also filed Cross objection on the appeal filed by the revenue. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the resp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... parts of boiler and not complete unit. Therefore, they are not entitled for benefit of the exemption stated hereinabove. 4. On the other hand, ld. counsel for the respondent produced the picture of the items produced by them. On bare going through the picture it looks like a boiler. Same was confirmed by the facts from Order in Original No. 030/CEX/2000 dated 3.20.2000 wherein the ld. Additional....