2013 (12) TMI 348
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ulkarni. ORDER:- Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the respondent. 3. We are happy to note that in the course of hearing of this appeal, the parties to the litigation have amicably resolved their dispute for the time being and therefore, the appeal is being disposed of with certain directions. 4. The respondent-company has filed winding up Peti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... was admitted and an order for publication of advertisement had been passed on 22nd January, 2013. 6. Being aggrieved by the said order, the appellant had filed A.P.O. No. 120 of 2013 in the Company Petition No. 306 of 2012, which has been rejected on 19th April, 2013 by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court and therefore, this appeal has been filed against the aforestated order. When thi....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI