Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (12) TMI 622

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...."the CST Act"). 2.. The assessee is a dealer in vermicelli at Madurai. It appears he effected inter-State sales of vermicelli during the assessment year 1988-89. He however, did not file any declaration in support of such sales. 3.. Invoking the power under section 17(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (for short, "the TNGST Act") the Government of Tamil Nadu issued a notification in G.O. P. No. 303 dated March 26, 1981 [No. II(1)/CTRE/ 164(c)/81] granting exemption in respect of the tax payable by any dealer on the sales of appalam, vermicelli and bakery products without a brand name or with a brand name not registered under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (Central Act 43 of 1958-for short "the TMM Act"), g....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Consequently, the assessee-dealer was subjected to tax under the CST Act at the appropriate rate in respect of interState sales of vermicelli he had effected during the assessment year 1988-89, depending upon the production or non-production of the "C" forms not only by the assessing officer, but also by the AAC and the Tribunal. 7.. The aggrieved assessee-dealer resorted to the present action-T.C. (R) No. 1 of 1994. 8.. (a) According to Mr. A. Chandrasekaran, learned counsel appearing for the assessee, the assessee-dealer is entitled to exemption in respect of interState sale transactions between April 1, 1988 and October 6, 1988 under section 8(2-A) of the CST Act and the assessee-dealer, if at all, he would say, is liable to pay t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under the State sales tax law if (i) under the State law the sale or purchase of such goods is exempt only in specified circumstances or (ii) if under the State law the sale or purchase of such is exempt only under specified conditions or (iii) if under the State law the tax is levied on the sale or purchase of such goods at specified stages or (iv) whereunder the State law the tax is levied otherwise than with reference to the turnover of the goods. (d) He would also state that G.O. P. No. 303 dated March 26, 1981 grants a total exemption, whereas G.O. P. No. 1316 dated October 7, 1988 grants only conditional exemption, in the sense of the limit having been prescribed to Rs. 3,00,000. Once there is a conditional exemption, he would fai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....notification issued under sub-section (1)." 12.. If we carefully peruse, the language in which sub-section (1) of section 17 is couched, it will be crystal clear that as and when the Government may, by notification, make an exemption or reduction in rate in respect of any tax payable under the Act, the same may be done whether prospectively or retrospectively. But, if we take into account the language in which sub-section (3) of section 17 is couched, the phraseology whether prospectively or retrospectively is not there and what is stated therein is the Government is empowered by way of a notification to cancel or vary any notification issued under sub-section (1). That means that notification issued under the said sub-section can be onl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ax and the inter-State sale transactions effected by him between October 7, 1988 and March 31, 1989 were to be subjected to tax under the CST Act at the appropriate rate, depending upon the production or nonproduction of the "C" forms. 15.. In this view of the matter, the orders of tax authorities inclusive of the Tribunal that the inter-State sale transactions effected by the assessee-dealer are liable to be taxed at the appropriate rate depending upon the production or non-production of the "C" forms are not sustainable in law and therefore, they are accordingly set aside. 16.. The assessee-dealer would, of course, claim that the inter-State sale transactions effected by him between April 1, 1988 and October 6, 1988 and between Octo....