Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (7) TMI 666

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... engaged in the business of hardware and paints. Inspection on the business premises of the assessee was conducted on March 5, 1988 and then stock variation to the extent of Rs. 50,000 was found. For that reason, the assessing officer estimated the turnover by adding 20 per cent to the taxable turnover. 3.. On appeal the appellate authority reduced the estimated turnover to three times of the s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... established by a single inspection. This finding of the Appellate Tribunal is wholly contrary to law. This is a case where the pattern of suppression is not established. The total turnover of the assessee is of the magnitude of Rs. 48,32,448. Stock variation is only to the tune of Rs. 50,000 and that too on a single date, viz., March 5, 1988. Considering these facts, the appellate authority reduc....