Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (12) TMI 10

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: PER : N Kumar The revenue has preferred this appeal challenging the order passed by the Tribunal which has set aside the penalty imposed by the Assessing Authority as well as the Appellate Authority on the ground that the assessee has furnished an inaccurate particulars. 2. The facts are not in dispute. The assessee is the company engaged in the business of construction of buildings. Fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order the assessee preferred an appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to claim deduction. Merely because the assessee withdrew the deduction, conceded to the demand of the department and paid tax and interest, as there is no malafide intention, the assessee cannot be imposed penalty and as such the order imposing penalty was set aside. Aggrieved by the said orde....