2013 (11) TMI 436

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ocate For the Respondent: Ms. Sabrina Cano, Superintendent (AR) ORDER Per: B.S.V. Murthy The appellant has three manufacturing units and the issue involved in this case is whether credit taken by their Doddaballapur unit is admissible or not. First show-cause notice was issued to the unit in Doddaballapur taking a view that appellant is not entitled for the credit since the Head Office....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t appeal discussed hereinabove. 2. The learned advocate on behalf of the appellants relies upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Beico Industries Ltd. vs. CCE, Nasik: 2012 (286) E.L.T. 689 (Tri.-Mum.) and submits that both the issues are covered in favour of the appellant in the above decision and therefore the pre-deposit may be waived and stay granted. 3. We have considered the ....