Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (11) TMI 136

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Appeals)-XXX, Kolkata in Appeal No. 135/CIT(A)-XXX/Circle-46/2009-10 dated February 24, 2012. The assessment was framed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-46, Kolkata, under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), for the assessment year 2007-08 vide his separate order dated November 26, 2009. The only issue in this appeal of the assesse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urse of assessment proceedings found that the assessee has debited a sum of Rs. 2,94,000 on account of managers' salary. The salary paid to Dipankar Panja was a sum of Rs. 1.74 lakhs and to Tanusree Panja was a sum of Rs. 1.20 lakhs, both being son and daughter-in-law of the assessee. The Assessing Officer disallowed one-third of the salary credited to Dipankar Panja and Tanusree Panja, that comes....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-tax (Appeals) has not examined the plea raised or services rendered by these persons as clarified before him. Even the Assessing Officer has not brought on record any reason why he has estimated disallowance. There is no whisper that these two employees, i.e., the managers, even though they may be son and daughter-in-law, have not carried out any business or rendered any services. The assessee be....