Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 902

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....havi, Mr. Rajan Mishra For the Respondent : Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly JUDGEMENT:- These two appeals filed by the appellant herein - viz: Mr. Lukas Folc and Mr. Sunil Rekhi, are directed against the Judgment dated 5 June 2013 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai. 2. Mr. Lukas Folc is former Managing Director of Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. (in short "said Co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....valuation of the imported goods for the purpose of assessment and consequently the appeal as filed would not be maintainable. 4. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has not raised any question of valuation of the goods for the purpose of assessment but the appellants have merely raised the question of penalty on the appellants who were employees....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aragraph 18 of the impugned order of the Tribunal. Learned Counsel further submits that Tribunal ought to have give separate reasons for upholding the imposition of penalty under Section 112 of Customs Act 1962 upon the present two appellants even while reducing the amount of penalty. 6. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and considering the submission made by learned Counsel for the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce Act (No.2) 2009.? 8. Considering the fact that the said Company has preferred an appeal before the Supreme Court in respect of the very order and it is the contention of the appellant that the issue is not pertaining either the rate of duty or valuation, we have admitted the appeals. These Appeals shall, however, be heard only after the Supreme Court decides Civil Appeal No (s). 6679 of 201....