2013 (10) TMI 315
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....awhney, Saurv Khurana and S.K. Mukhi. For the Respondent : Yogesh Putney, Rajesh Katoch and Ms. Savita Saxena. JUDGMENT:- PER : A.K. Sikri In all these petitions, insertion of conditions in the third and forth proviso to Section 80 HHC (3) of the Act by amendment of Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2005 with retrospective effect have been challenged. It is a matter of record that ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f the Transfer Petitions before the Supreme Court and the judgment of the Gujarat High Court. Only the first four writ petitions listed above were the subject matter of the Transfer Petitions. In other words, the first four matters stood transferred to the Gujarat High Court pursuant to the above orders of the Supreme Court. The other petitions, therefore, did not stand....
TaxTMI