2013 (10) TMI 258

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ainst the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('the Tribunal' for short) dated 30th June 2011. For the assessment year 2005-06, following questions have been presented for our consideration :      "(A) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs. 61,21,033/- made on account of law gross profit?    &nb....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l submissions, we do not find any justification to interfere with the order of the learned CIT(A) in deleting the addition. The AO merely gone by the fact that there was a fall in the gross profit rate as compared to the preceding assessment year which itself is no ground to reject the books of account of the assessee. No specific defect in the maintenance of the books of account by the assessee h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cordingly, there is no merit in this ground of appeal of the revenue. The same is accordingly, dismissed."      From the above, it can be seen that the entire issue is based on appreciation of evidence on record. No question of law, therefore, arises particularly when the Commissioner (Appeals) as well as the Tribunal concurrently held in favour of the assessee. Issue No.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t as to which of the expenses incurred by the assessee was not connected with the business activity of the assessee. The AO has not pointed out which of the expenditure were not admissible in law. In the absence of any pointing out in admissible expenses, the AO cannot make addition merely by comparing the expenditure with the preceding year's expenditure. The learned CIT(A) on proper appreciation....