2013 (10) TMI 28
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... JUDGMENT Admit. 2. Board has been revised. No one appears for the appellant to press this appeal. 3. We have gone through the record and considered the facts involved. We heard learned counsel Ms. Sejal Mandavia for the respondent Central Excise. After hearing the learned counsel for the respondent, we formulate following substantial question of law. "Whether CESTAT, Ahmedabad was....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....asking them to show cause as to why Cenvat Credit availed on the goods transported by the appellant should not be denied and as to why the penalty should not be imposed. Similar show cause was issued to the appellant to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed under the provisions of Central Excise Rules read with Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant was under the impression that sin....
TaxTMI