Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (9) TMI 969

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the Income Tax, 1961 (?Act? for short) impugns order dated 25.06.2010, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case M/s. Lahsa Construction Pvt. Ltd. on the ground of perversity. The appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 1999-2000. (incorrectly mentioned in the impugned order as assessment year 2006-07). 2. Property in question bearing No.C-20, NDSE, South Ex., Part-II, New Delhi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....de by the assessing officer. The respondent/assessee had disclosed sale consideration of as Rs.39,00,000/- for sale of their 50% share, in the property to Mrs. Madhu Arora. Mrs. Madhu Arora and Mr. Om Prakash Arora paid an amount of Rs.44,00,000/- to the four individual co-owners for purchase of the balance 50% share. Thus, in all they had shown sale consideration of Rs.83,00,000/-, instead of Rs.....