Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (9) TMI 541

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent: Shri Parmod Kumar, JC (AR) JUDGEMENT Applicant has filed this application for rectification of mistake perceived by them in Final Order No.1212/11 dt. 2.11.2011 issued by the Tribunal by which an appeal filed by Revenue was allowed. The issue involved in the appeal was whether CENVAT credit could be taken on electrodes used by the applicant in their factory. In the impugned....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cture of Nozzle by Electro Chemical Machine (ECM) and Electro Discharge Machine (EDM). According to the assessee, in the process, the electrode work piece is first machined by electrical discharges occurring across a dielectric fluid and the same subsequently subjected to a finishing pass in a course of which it is machined by electrochemical machining (ECM) through a conductive electrolyte replac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....apter sub-heading nos. 8456 & 8466, I find that the impugned electrodes can well be fitted into chapter sub-heading 8466 as parts suitable for use solely with the machines of heading no.8456. Thus, I conclude that the classification of the electrodes is to be rightly done under chapter sub-heading 8466 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, as per rule 1 of interpretative rule mentioned above. Even w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and CCE Mumbai Vs RDC Concrete (India) P. Ltd. - 2011 (270) ELT 625 (SC). 6. I have considered the submissions from both sides. The facts involved in the case law cited by Revenue are not same as the one involved in the facts of present case before me. In this case, there are wrong facts were taken on record, without indicating the source, in the Tribunal's final order. So it is only proper th....