Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws →

☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2013 (9) TMI 61

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent: Shri. Rupendra Singh, Advocate JUDGEMENT Per Archana Wadhwa (for the Bench): The appellant is a 100% EOU and cleared paper cones to one M/s. Nagerika Export Ltd. another 100% EOU. However, the goods were damaged during transit and were received back by the appellants. The same were sorted out and it was found that 84699 cones were rejected out of total 176690 pieces cleared to M/s. ....

PrevPreviousNextNext