2013 (7) TMI 858

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....harma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. Two grounds have been pressed for challenging the order of the State Government dated 14th October, 2010 under Section 11 (2) of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910, whereby revision filed by the licencee-petitioner has been dismissed. Facts leading to the present writ petition are as follows: Petition....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar. For the breach of the conditions of Rules, 2002 a notice was issued to the petitioner. Petitioner more or less admitted sale of liquor of the previous year and on that basis the Collector proceeded to cancel the licence of the petitioner under order dated 7th May, 2010. Not being satisfied, petitioner filed an appeal under Section 11 (1) of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910, before the Excise Commi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itted by the licencee was compoundable under Section 74 of the Excuse Act. It is also contended that licence security could not have been forfeited while cancelling the licence of the petitioner. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the records of the present writ petition. It is not necessary for this Court to enter into the necessi....