2013 (7) TMI 585
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Nemo ORDER Sanjiv Khanna, J. (Oral): This appeal by the Revenue, which pertains to Assessment Year 2005-06, has to be dismissed in view of the authoritative pronouncement of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax versus Alagendran Finance Limited, (2007) 293 ITR 1 (SC). 2. Relevant facts in brief may be noticed. Return filed by the assessee f....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....re made in respect of non-deduction of tax at source on payment of interest to ABN Amro Bank, Stockholm Branch. The second addition was made on account of ESOP expenses. The said order also discusses set off or brought forward loss or unabsorbed depreciation. 5. Subsequently, the Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi - I made an order under Section 263 of the Act dated 24th March, 2011 for failure t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2007 is taken as the starting point, the order passed under Section 263, dated 24th March, 2011 is barred by limitation, but if we treat the second order dated 10th December, 2009 under Section 147/143(3) as the starting point, the order passed on 24th March, 2011 will be within time. 8. It is factually correct and cannot be disputed that the two aspects/questions, which have been dealt with an....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the period of limitation provided for under sub-section (2) of section 263 of the Act would begin to run from the date of the order of assessment and not from the order of reassessment. The revisional jurisdiction having, thus, been invoked by the Commissioner of Income Tax beyond the period of limitation, it was wholly without jurisdiction rendering the entire proceeding a nullity." 9. In the....
TaxTMI