Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (7) TMI 287

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ue has come up on appeal as against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai "A" Bench, dated December 19, 2003, in IT (SS) A No. 13/Mds/96 raising the following substantial questions of law : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in quashing the block assessment made on the assessee on the ground that the asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ms, no materials were found, which justified the additions that the assessee had undisclosed income. Even in respect of the jewellery seized, the assessee contended that the same belonged to the family. The Assessing Officer pointed out that the assessee had furnished explanation in respect of 415 grams of gold jewellery as against the seizure of 441 grams. In respect of 26 grams, the assessee poi....