2013 (7) TMI 130
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h Mr.Vishal Mohan, Advocate For the respondents: Mr.Raji v Jiwan, Advocate. ORDER A.M. Khanwilkar, Chief Justice (Oral): Heard counsel for the parties. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent. Counsel for the respondents waives notice. Taken up for final disposal forthwith, by consent. 2. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India primarily takes exc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....was also argued by the counsel for the petitioner that besides the two counts on which the apex Court allowed the appeal, the petitioner would press one more ground that no penalty could be levied, muchless exceeding Rs.10,000/-. 4. Considering the above, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and relegate the petitioner before the Appellate Tribunal for reconsideration of the request ....
TaxTMI