Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (7) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ons of law as arising for consideration as both questions and the findings recorded by the tribunal is erroneous and warrants interference.    "Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in directing the Assessing Officer not to exclude 90% of gains on foreign exchange fluctuations from the business profits for quantification of deduction admissible u/s 80HHE of the Act?    Whether the Tribunal was correct in allowing the cross objections filed by the assessee that the business profits should not be reduced by unabsorbed depreciation and unabsorbed loss before computing deduction u/s. 80HHE of the Act? 3. Under the impugned order, the tribunal had dismissed the appeal preferred by the revenue contending that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the foreign exchange rate as exports were invoiced in terms of foreign currency. The assessee had also computed the business profits, without adjusting the brought forward unabsorbed depreciation of the earlier years and carried forward losses of the earlier years and also in the computation of the profits attributable to exports. 7. The assessing officer held that the difference attributable to the fluctuation in the exchange rate and the amount received is not any part of the value of the exported software but because of the fortuitous circumstances and therefore cannot be added to the export turnover. Insofar as the deductions are concerned, the assessing officer therefore directed that 90% of the income has to be reduced in arriving ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 11. Appearing on behalf of revenue, the submission of Sri Aravind, learned standing counsel is that with reference to Section 80HHC(i) now read as Section 80HHC(iv), the assessee is entitled for the benefit of Section 80HHE deduction from the gains that is derived by the assessee from the business of export activity; that the gains attributable to fluctuation in foreign exchange rate is not precisely derived from the export business but because of the fortuitous circumstance of the exchange rate being not the same throughout and the word 'derived' having come in for interpretation and noticed by the Supreme Court in the case of LIBERTY INDIA LIMITED vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX reported in 317 ITR 218 and following its earlier view ta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R 454 and though it was a case rendered in the context of the benefits to be claimed under Section 80HHC, the ratio is equally applicable to the deduction that can be claimed under Section 80HHE of the Act and in terms of the answer to a similar question posed for determination, the question had been answered in favour of the revenue and therefore, the question may be answered in favour of the revenue. 15. However, with regard to the first question regarding the amount attributable to the fluctuation in the foreign exchange rate, Mr Suryanarayana would submit that this amount is not the amount which can be said to be derived from the second degree source as pointed out in the very judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Liberty Indi....