2013 (6) TMI 229
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....R The Appellant was present in person. On behalf of the Respondent, Shri A.K. Mishra was present. 2. Both the parties were present and made their submissions. 3. The Appellant had wanted to inspect all the records relating to the proposed disciplinary action and/or imposition of penalty against Sri G.S. Narang, IRS, Central Excise and Customs Service. The CPIO had denied the information b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ome particular officer. Our attention was drawn to a Division Bench ruling by the High Court of Kerala in the WA No. 2781/2009 in which the Court had held that information sought by an employee, from his employer, in respect of domestic enquiry and confidential reports of his colleagues would not amount to personal information as provided under Section 8(1)(j) of Right to Information (RTI) Act. In....
TaxTMI