2013 (6) TMI 182

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....10 suspending the license of the petitioner has been cancelled. The order dated 3-9-2010 issued under Regulation No. 20 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as "the Regulations of 2004") was earlier questioned before this Court in Writ Petition No. 4849 of 2010 and on 4-10-2010, that petition was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail of the appropriate remedy in law. 3.It appears that, thereafter, the petitioner approached the Chief Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise by way of representation. That Authority has, on 12-10-2010, passed the order of which implementation is sought. The Authority has mentioned Regulation 20(2) of the Regulations of 2004 r/w. Section....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... according to the respondents, shows the approval to the order dated 3-9-2010, is produced before this Court. That original shows that the Chief Commissioner at Nagpur has approved the note prepared on 28-9-2010 and 29-9-2010 on 30-9-2010. The said note was then forwarded to the Chief Commissioner (Bhopal Zone) and it was returned back as the Chief Commissioner was not available at Bhopal. It was then sent to the Chief Commissioner of Customs at Delhi. The Chief Commissioner at Delhi has signed it, but he has not put any date on it. 7. Learned Counsel Mr. Jagtap has pointed out that the afore-mentioned signature at Delhi is obviously put after 26-10-2010 as per movement of file, as reflected in the reply-affidavit. Mr. Mishra, learned A.....